Peer Reviews

Peer review #1:

http://abstractmuse.blogspot.com/

Project #1

Project #1 looked pretty good to me, aside from it not being in the blog and just linked on the blog as a photobucket page. I have a feeling when I was looking for people that actually completed these projects that those that did couldn't get it directly on their blog page. The pictures represented each element and principle just fine.

Project #2

http://abstractmuse.blogspot.com/2016/02/project-2-art-gallery-visit-1_28.html

Project #2 had the answers to the questions and descriptions of each painting but was poorly done in that she never uploaded the actual images to the blog. It was really hard to connect anything she was saying about the pieces because i couldn't see them.



Peer review #2

Project #1

http://sidorwi01.blogspot.com/2016/02/project-1-14-elements.html?showComment=1457237955395#c6470475957051762129

Project #1 looked really good to me, I thought all elements and principles were captured even though He felt limited in what he had available for subject matter.

Project # 2

http://sidorwi01.blogspot.com/2016/02/project-2.html?showComment=1457238290784#c4467387599816203659

This project #2 was incredible.  He did what I did and posted the images directly to the blog which was easy to find, and clearly labeled.  He chose one picture to learn more about which I used in my project # 2, so I provided my insight.  He did and excellent job on this project.


The process of going through these blogs was frustrating in that so many people either chose not to do the assignments or they were done poorly with no pictures embedded directly to the blog.  I went through about 10 people before i found one blog that kind of worked and another blog that was done amazing.  I think that getting a peer review is really nice, I was surprised when I read mine, before I knew it was an assignment to do so.  I thought someone actually took time to look at my blog on their own, haha!  But like I said it's not to get critique.